A representative from Students for Concealed Carry on Campus argued for a more sensible policy for carrying concealed handguns on college and university campuses at Walter Hall last night.
“It’s hypocritical to say you can bring a gun into a 300-person movie theatre but not a 300-person lecture hall,” said Stephen Feltoon, Midwest regional director of SCCC.
Feltoon, a 2007 graduate of Miami University of Ohio, spoke for a 40-person group as part of the SCCC’s weeklong protest of concealed carry laws across the nation that forbid concealed handguns on college campuses.
The OU Second Amendment club — comprising about 10 active members who participate in shooting activities and safety lessons — invited Feltoon to speak for the occasion.
Current Ohio law states that you cannot bring a concealed firearm on campus unless you have a license to do so and the gun is locked in your car or you are in the immediate process of locking it in your car, Feltoon said.
“That’s it,” he said. “One sentence removes my right and yours to carry a concealed firearm on campus.”
Feltoon refuted several counter-arguments he often hears, like the idea that college students are often highly stressed drinkers and drug users. He said it is illegal to carry a gun while under the influence of alcohol whether you are on campus or not.
SCCC began as a Facebook group after the shootings on the campus of Virginia Tech last year. The group then held its first empty-holster protest on Oct. 22, 2007.
After another shooting at Northern Illinois University, the groups’ membership grew to about 22,000.
“If Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois taught us anything it’s that putting up a sign that says ‘no guns allowed’ really doesn’t work,” Feltoon said.







Reader Comments
The right of self-defense is a corollary to the right to life; to deny one is to deny the other. And the purpose of government is to insure our rights, not to infringe on them.
The fact is that governments should not be involved in permitting the carriage of weapons, either openly or concealed.
Our constitution states that the right to keep (possess) and bear (carry) arms shall not be infringed. Marbury v. Madison (1803) decided that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and that any law that contradicts the Constitution is null and void.
In Murdock v. Pennsylvania (1943) the Supreme Court stated that a constitutionally-protected right may not be licensed, nor a fee charged. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms is one of those protected natural rights.
In Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, Alabama (1962) the Supreme Court decided that “If the state does convert a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.” (That means they can't punish you, folks!)
To paraphrase an oft-quoted movie line, "Permits? We don' need no steenking permits!"
Neil Evangelista
Pistol & Personal Protection Instructor
Boca Raton, FL
Submit a comment to The Post