I figured that spending two weeks in the environmentally-progressive city of San Francisco would only further cement my “green” beliefs, and after less than a week it already has.
The convenience of going green is something that turns a lot of people away — with busy schedules and lives, it is difficult for people to dedicate a lot of time to a more sustainable lifestyle. But San Francisco really does a good job of bringing the sustainability to you, making it easier for people to replace habits that are unhealthy for the planet with ones that have less of a negative impact.
Recycling as easy as trashing
Before I left for San Francisco, I was at my hometown’s mall with an empty aluminum can and nowhere to dispose of it except for a garbage can. I chose to put the can in my purse until I could recycle it somewhere else, but I couldn’t stop thinking about how convenient it would be to have recycling cans alongside trash cans so that it was easier for people to avoid sending their aluminum, plastics and glass to the landfill.
So of course, it was eerie to walk the streets of Oakland, looking for a place to dispose of my gum, and find trashcans with recycling receptacles on top of them. It seemed almost too simple — built-in recycling bins on top of trash cans. They take up the same amount of space on the ground, but they just slightly taller than the average trash can.
This creates an awareness to the consumer that there is more than just one option for discarding goods. By giving someone the option to choose where their garbage will go, it builds a consciousness that might not have existed or been as strong about recycling.
Did someone say organic?
I don’t think I’ve ever seen so much organic food in all of my life as I have in just a few days in San Francisco. Even AT&T Park, home of the San Francisco Giants — and former Cleveland Indian Omar Vizquel — has a farmer’s market concession stand complete with organic food choices.
And the grocery stores are the same way. Within a few blocks there is a Safeway, a traditional grocery store; Trader Joe’s, a grocery store that offers exotic, local and organic foods; and Whole Foods, a traditionally expensive but still organic and natural foods store. People aren’t cornered into choosing between supermarkets like Wal-Mart, K-Mart or Target, and easy access to local, organic and natural foods is unbelievable.
Beyond just selling organic food, there is a real aura of locality that is equally as beneficial to the environment. Local people using local ingredients for their local businesses to serve local people. Aside from a KFC down the street, there is barely any kind of chain restaurant within walking distance.
Subway isn’t just a restaurant
Chatting about public transportation is easier to do when discussing big cities because they are so congested that pubic transportation is a profitable investment. But being able to hop onto the subway or a bus (I haven’t ventured onto the cable cars yet) while avoiding both traffic and the gas pump is quite a change. Of course, it isn’t free, but it’s so convenient that it makes me wish I could just hop on a train to get from Athens to Cleveland every time I go home for the weekend.
These are only a few examples of how bringing the sustainability to the consumer can be beneficial, and I’m sure I’ll observe many more before I leave to return to Ohio. That isn’t to say this is the perfect city, or that other cities and towns are not as good because they don’t have the same conveniences. What it does say is that people are willing to embrace a sustainable lifestyle, but it helps if it’s a two-way street. People wanting to change is not necessarily enough — it is a great help when cities and businesses accommodate those people by offering alternatives; who knows, they might find the environmental demographic is larger than they thought.






Reader Comments
I occasionally agree with Cathy's columns, but this San Francisco nonsense reeks of unconscious elitism. Yeah, we'll bring Whole Foods to Southeast Ohio. Too bad the average resident can't afford to shop there. That's true for many parts of the country.
Organic food is a crock and a rip-off, by the way. Eating it is MORE dangerous because it is more likely to be crawling with bacteria. Sure, it's "all natural" (which, by the way, rarely means "more nutritious"), but you're also putting yourself at risk for a deadly e. coli infection.
Besides, I'd choose food grown in chemical fertilizers than food grown in manure any day. EW.
If she doesn't want to sound totally out-of-touch, she should probably resist attacking Wal-Mart...you know, the places where people with a $25,000 annual income can afford to buy food.
Ohio used to be covered in railways, however, since they became a drain on revenue and were largely unused, many were converted to one of the largest chains of bike trails in the US. Most Greenies love the prospect of being able to bike from Dayton to Cinci through some of the prettiest country north of the Mason-Dixon line.
SF does make it easy to recycle, but it is not an option to do so as you mention in parag. 5. This "option" is mandated by a $1000 fine for not recycling.... a great progressive freedom of choice right there.
There really shouldn't be a "freedom of choice" in recycling. While a $1000 fine may not be the best solution, your argument is as logical as saying I should have "freedom of choice" in whether or not I dump my trash in a river or a landfill. Who care's which is better for the planet, I want my choice as to whether I care or not.
I'm not for every type or recycling, as much is a waste and more harmful than most people would believe, but for things like paper, aluminum and glass, there's not doubt it should be mandatory. It's better for the environment, there's a market for aluminum (and therefore money to be made) and there's not a real drawback to any of those materials except the 2 seconds it takes you to put the material in a separate container when throwing it away.
$1000 fine is ridiculous, it's excessive for what we're talking about, but when a solid recycling infrastructure has been put in place and made accessible to the general population, there's absolutely no reason except shear laziness for someone not doing it.
NG5000, lemmie try again, I guess I wasn't very clear: SF is touted as being at the forefront of the movement for freedom of choice in every way. From drugs to illegal aliens to sexual orientation, they seem to be on the forefrontof total freedom of choice, no matter what the national law is. So I was just making a simplified statement that it was ironic that a bastion of such freedoms found it necessary to slap average joe with a $1000 fine when he was too groggy to put that glass bottle in the recycling bin as he went to work at 4am.
Not saying recycling is bad, just suprised at the harsh reprimand that such a lenient city would place on it.
Submit a comment to The Post